Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Ohio App. 3d 1 - State v. Wilson

102 Ohio App. 3d 1 - State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 6 Ohio App. 3d 56 - State v. Johnson · 75 Ohio App. 3d 595 - City of Warren v. Patrone · 21 Ohio App. 3d 67 - Village of Kirtland Hills v. Logan · Sopko v. Maxwell · 48 Ohio App. 3d 121 - State v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is not necessary that the affidavit be executed by one who observed the commission of the offense. It is sufficient if such person has reasonable grounds to believe that the accused has committed the crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a conviction for speeding will not be reversed on sufficiency grounds even if a radar reading was improperly admitted into evidence when the officer testified that, based upon his visual observation, the vehicle was speeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““No person shall knowingly cause another to believe that the offender will cause physical harm to the person or property of such other person or member of his immediate family.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.