102 Ohio App. 3d 28 - State v. Braxton’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
142 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 146 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably 137 Ohio App. 3d 718 - State v. Landrum (2000), City of Columbus v. Aleshire (2010)
142 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 146 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the nature of the remarks, (2) whether an objection was made by counsel, (3) whether corrective instructions were given by the court, and (4) the strength of the evidence against the defendant.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage“the remarks were improper and, if so, whether they prejudicially affected substantial rights of the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fudge · State v. Hunt“an isolated incident in an otherwise properly tried case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.