Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Ohio App. 3d 302 - Arthur v. Parenteau

102 Ohio App. 3d 302 - Arthur v. Parenteau’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2020

2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

1301995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 9 Ohio App. 2d 123 - Brown v. Columbus Stamping & Mfg. Co. · 2 Ohio App. 3d 29 - Amf, Inc. v. Mravec · 57 Ohio App. 3d 84 - Gabriele v. Reagan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is elementary that in an action on an account, a plaintiff must set forth an actual copy of the recorded account. The records must show the name of the party charged and must include the following: (1) a beginning balance (zero, or a sum that can qualify as an account stated, or some other provable sum); (2) listed items, or an item, dated and identifiable by number or otherwise, representing charges, or debits, and credits; and (3) summarization by means of a running or developing balance, or an arrangement of beginning balance and items which permits the calculation of the amount claimed to be due.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We note that if appellant's complaint was intended to be an action on an account, the complaint could have been dismissed * * * .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.