102 Ohio App. 3d 534 - State v. Blankenship’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
220 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 222 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 128 Ohio App. 3d 419 - State v. Carter (1998), 149 Ohio App. 3d 237 - State v. Gordon (2002)
220 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Jenks · State v. Bradley · United States v. Calandra · State v. Long
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 222 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only upon a showing of good cause, such as a conflict of interest, a complete breakdown in communication, or an irreconcilable conflict which leads to an apparently unjust result.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage“An appellate court will not disturb the exercise of this discretion absent a showing that the accused has suffered material prejudice.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] trial court's interrogation of a witness is not deemed partial for purposes of Evid.R. 614(B) merely because the evidence elicited during the questioning is potentially damaging to the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.