102 Ohio App. 3d 758 - State v. Tichon’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
199 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 200 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably State v. Harris (1998), 126 Ohio App. 3d 193 - State v. Smith (1998)
199 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Atkinson · State v. Williams · State v. Waddy · Paugh v. Hanks · Jordan v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 200 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The] error must be obvious and have a substantial adverse impact on the integrity of and the public's confidence in judicial proceedings.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[o]ther acts evidence can be particularly useful in prosecutions for menacing by stalking because it can assist the jury in understanding that a defendant's otherwise innocent appearing acts, when put into the context of previous contacts he has had with the victim, may be knowing attempts to cause mental distress.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“two or more actions or incidents closely related in time, whether or not there has been a prior conviction based on any of those actions or incidents.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.