Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 OHIOST3D 358 - State v. Hoffner

State v. Hoffner’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

214
cited by 214 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 210 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 214 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Foster (2006), State v. Conway (2006)

2 federal appellate · 210 state decisions

950200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · State v. Bradley · Ring v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 214 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Debatable trial tactics do not establish ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In order to determine whether a person is in custody for purposes of receiving Miranda warnings, courts must first inquire into the circumstances surrounding the questioning and, second, given those circumstances, determine whether a reasonable person would have felt that he or she was not at liberty to terminate the interview and leave.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[j]udicial scrutiny of counsel's performance must be highly deferential. It is all too tempting for a defendant to second-guess counsel's assistance after a conviction or adverse sentence, and it is all too easy for a court, examining counsel's defense after it has proved unsuccessful, to conclude that a particular act or omission of counsel was unreasonable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.