State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 district · 65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably State v. Emerson (2012), State ex rel. Colvin v. Brunner (2008)
1 district · 65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alderman v. United States · State v. Williams · State v. Wilson · 55 Ohio St. 183 - H. B. Clafflin Co. v. Evans · State ex rel. Asberry v. Payne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he paramount consideration in determining the meaning of a statute is legislative intent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In reviewing a statute, a court cannot pick out one sentence and disassociate it from the context, but must look to the four corners of the enactment to determine the intent of the enacting body.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re C.D.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.