State v. Zima’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
102 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Ruff (2015), State v. Cabrales (2008)
102 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Santobello v. New York · Brown v. Ohio · United States v. Dixon · Whalen v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not. A single act may be an offense against two statutes, and if each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not, an acquittal or conviction under either statute does not exempt the defendant from prosecution and punishment under the other.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[n]o person shall * * * be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb * * *.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“'defendant should be aware that a plea taken before a municipal judge with limited criminal jurisdiction might not dispose of the matter fully.' " (Internal citation omitted.) Id. The Zima decision reasoned that, in Carpenter, the defendant's expectation that the guilty plea would terminate further prosecution was "inherently justified because the prosecutor and the court had jurisdiction over all the charges, both actual and potential, and because the negotiated guilty plea included the dismissal of all pending charges.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.