Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 OHIOST3D 81 - Pratts v. Hurley

Pratts v. Hurley’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

405
cited by 405 later decisions
3
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

403 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 405 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably State v. Harper (Slip Opinion) (2020), Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta (Slip Opinion) (2014)

403 state decisions

1920200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · United States v. Cotton · State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. Suster · Patton v. Diemer · Morrison v. Steiner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 405 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where there is an unlawful restraint of a person's liberty and no adequate remedy at law.”
    67 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.