Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Okla. 131 - Myers v. Chamness

Myers v. Chamness’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 1960
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1960

21 state decisions

12019241930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pettis v. Johnston · Kerr v. . Kerr · Ziska v. Avey · Edwards v. Smith · Morgan v. Karcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The judgment sought to be vacated was rendered without service of summons upon the defendant, but upon an unauthorized appearance by attorneys; therefore, the court did not, in fact, acquire jurisdiction of the person of the defendant. This infirmity did not appear upon the face of the judgment, hence it was not void, in the legal sense, but was voidable, and should have been vacated on the motion of the defendant, calling the court’s attention to such unauthorized appearance, and evidence dehors the record was admissible to show such unauthorized appearance, and want of jurisdiction. Edwards v. Smith, 42 Okla. 544 , 142 Pac. 302 ; Pettis v. Johnston, 78 Okla. 277 , 190 Pac. 681 . Under these circumstances, relief might have been had under the 3rd subdivision of section 810, Comp. Slat. 1921, on account of irregularity in obtaining the judgment, and it was unnecessary for the motion to vacate to be supported by an answer showing a meritorious defense, or to in any other manner show such defense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.