Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Okla. 192 - Ex Parte Tindall

Ex Parte Tindall’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2024 · most notably New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann (1932), C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Capshaw (1930)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 61 state decisions

27019241930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Munn v. Illinois · James Brown v. State of New Jersey · Ochoa v. Hernandez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The term ‘public service corporation’ shall include all transportation and transmission companies, all gas, electric light, heat and power companies, and all persons authorized to exercise the right of' eminent domain, or to use or occupy any right of way, street, alley, or public highway, whether along, over, or under the same, in a manner not permitted to the general public, the term ‘person,’ as used in this article, shall include individuals, partnerships and corporations, in the singular as well as plural number.* * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is a matter of common knowledge, therefore, one of which courts will take cognizance, that the advent of throngs of automobiles and motor vehicles has necessitated the building of paved roads at a burdensome expense to the public. The public, as such, is therefore vested with a property right in such highways, and it is folly to argue that the public has no voice as to who shall appropriate its highways to their own free use and then charge the public a profit for such use.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““No person shall be deprived of life liberty, or property, without due process of law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.