State v. Borboa’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
June 2006
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Williams v. People of State of New York · McMillan v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) An offender who is not a persistent offender shall be sentenced under this section if the offender: (a) Is convicted of: (i) Rape in the first degree, rape in the second degree ... (3) Upon a finding that the offender is subject to sentencing -under this section, the court shall impose a sentence to a maximum term consisting of the statutory maximum sentence for the offense and a minimum term either within the standard sentence range for the offense, or outside the standard sentence range pursuant to RCW 9.94A.535, if the offender is otherwise eligible for such a sentence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Monroe · State v. Brundage“First, it requires the sentencing court to set a minimum term that may be standard or exceptional. Second, it permits the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board to set a second minimum term which, if imposed, takes effect at the end of the court's minimum term. Third, it requires the sentencing court to set a maximum term that equals the statutory maximum sentence. The defendant must serve each minimum term that is imposed, but he need not serve the maximum term unless the minimum terms happen to equal it. Instead of being a sentence that the defendant must actually serve, the maximum term is merely a limitation on the combined total of the court's and the Board's minimum terms. Indeed, it is a limitation that simply reiterates in the context of RCW 9.94A.712 what is already in the statutes elsewhere: that in general neither the court nor the Board shall maintain jurisdiction over the defendant for more than life if the crime is a Class A felony, for more than ten years if the crime is a Class B felony, or for more than five years if the crime is a Class C felony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“require that the jury find each fact needed to support the sentence that the defendant actually must serve.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Clarke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.