Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 R.I. 426 - Stringfellow v. Whichelo

Stringfellow v. Whichelo’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
July 1991
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1991

10 state decisions

401967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3931 (Servicemembers Civil Relief Act)

Relies on Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Higgins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts interpreting § 521 have observed that for the movant to invoke the protection of the [Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act], he must make a showing of his actual unavailability and that his rights would be adversely affected by virtue of his absence from trial. [Citations omitted] Where a court determines that a serviceman did not exercise due diligence in attempting to make himself available for trial then the court may determine that the movant's military service did not affect his ability to conduct his own defense. [citation omitted] Courts denying motions for stays under § 521 have noted that mere contentions of unavailability, without affirmative representations that leave to attend trial was sought by the serviceman and refused are insufficient to warrant the imposition of such relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is clear that respondent was entitled to the requested stay in the absence of a finding by the trial justice that his ability to conduct his defense would not be materially affected by reason of his military service. See Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Higgins, 76 Cal. App.2d 854, 859 , 174 P.2d 450, 454 . Such a finding is a condition precedent to the denial of an application for such relief. The trial justice made no finding on this issue. * * * ( 230 A.2d at 860 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the serviceman's ability to conduct his defense is not materially affected by reason of his military service, if such petition is denied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.