102 So. 3d 239 - Janneck v. LWCC’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc. · 737 So. 2d 41 - Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc. · 840 So. 2d 1181 - Authement v. Shappert Engineering · 733 So. 2d 11 - Parfait v. Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. · 678 So. 2d 627 - Faul v. Bonin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether an employer acted arbitrarily, capriciously or without probable cause in denying payment of compensation and medical benefits to trigger the imposition of attorney fees, arbitrary and capricious behavior consists of willful and unreasoning action, without consideration and regard for facts and circumstances presented, or of seemingly unfounded motivation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A workers' compensation claimant is entitled to penalties and attorney's fees if benefits are withheld arbitrarily, capriciously, or without probable cause by employer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An employer also has a duty to investigate and make every reasonable effort to assemble and ascertain whether a claim is compensable before denying benefits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.