Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 So. 3d 247 - State v. Pleasant

102 So. 3d 247 - State v. Pleasant’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · State v. Williams · 796 So. 2d 649 - State v. Neal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ll persons concerned in the commission of a crime, whether present or absent, and whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, aid and abet in its commission, or directly or indirectly counsel or procure another to commit the crime, are principals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although factors that can contribute to the finding that a defendant is a principal include 'standing by the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice's intention.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.