¶1Affirmed. See Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), review dismissed, 29 So.3d 291 (Fla.2010); Ward v. State, 946 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Macaluso v. State, 912 So.2d 694 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Bizzell v. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Ives v. State, 993 So.2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Clayton v. State, 904 So.2d 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Wright v. State, 834 So.2d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Sampson v. State, 832 So.2d 251 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Middleton v. State, 721 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
102 So. 3d 666
Rooks v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 18, 2012
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-01-18
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2016
3 state decisions
Relies on Hughes v. State · Brown v. State · 993 So. 2d 117 - Ives v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2012-01-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →