Reder v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 970 So. 2d 312 - McDuffie v. State · 716 So. 2d 842 - Keitel v. Keitel · 914 So. 2d 1090 - DeMello v. Buckman · 604 So. 2d 883 - Paul v. Johnson · 691 So. 2d 565 - NORTHSTAR INVESTMENTS & DEVEL. v. Pobaco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We recognize that a judgment of contempt will not be overturned unless the trial court either abused its discretion or departed so substantially from the law that fundamental error occurred. See DeMello [v. Buckman], 914 So.2d [1090,] 1093 [(Fla. 4th DCA 2005)]. However, a trial court’s discretion is limited by rules, statutes, and case law, and a trial court abuses its discretion when its ruling is based on an erroneous view of the law. See McDuffie v. State, 970 So.2d 312, 326 (Fla.2007).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““[T]he law ... imposes upon the court the requirement to be explicit and precise in its commands if strict compliance is to be exacted in the form of a contempt citation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The prior judge's intent . . . cannot form the basis of a finding of contempt when that intent was not plainly expressed in the written order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.