Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 SW2D 293 - Hoff v. Westhoff

Hoff v. Westhoff’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1965
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 1965

6 state decisions

301936194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of San Antonio v. Strumberg · City of Dayton v. Allred · City of Goose Creek v. Hunnicutt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think it a principle established by the overwhelming weight of authority in the courts of all countries subject to the common law that no action lies to restrain an interference with a mere public right, at the suit of an individual who has not suffered or is not threatened with some damage peculiar to himself.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.