Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 S.W.3d 735 - Cates v. State

Cates v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Tisdale v. State · Tyra v. State · Mann v. State · Mann v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The evidence must demonstrate that the deadly weapon was used or exhibited “during the transaction from which” the felony conviction is obtained. To sustain a deadly weapon finding, there must be evidence that others were actually endangered, not “merely a hypothetical potential for danger if others had been present.” An automobile can be a deadly weapon if it is driven so as to endanger fives.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(A) a firearm or anything manifestly designed, made, or adapted for the purpose of inflicting death or serious bodily injury; or (B) anything in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Therefore, the relevant time period for determining whether his truck was used and exhibited as a deadly weapon is the time period after [the victim] was hit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.