Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 U.S. 123 - Tiernan v. Rinker

Tiernan v. Rinker’s Empirical Analysis

102 U.S. 123 · 1880

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
14
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

9 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019 · most notably Leisy v. Hardin (1890), Kidd v. Pearson (1888)

9 district · 32 state decisions — followed in 14 states

29018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Welton v. The State of Missouri · Wayman v. Southard · State ex rel. Huston v. Commissioners · State v. Eastabrook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The provisions of every statute shall be severable. If any provision of any statute or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the statute, and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby, unless the court finds that the valid provisions of the statute are so essentially and inseparably connected with, and so depend upon, the void provision or application, that it cannot be presumed the General Assembly would have enacted the remaining valid provisions without the void one; or unless the court finds that the remaining valid provisions, standing alone, are incomplete and incapable of being executed in accordance with the legislative intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.