Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 U.S. 318 - Lanahan v. Sears

Lanahan v. Sears’s Empirical Analysis

102 U.S. 318 · 1880

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
July 1992
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1992

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

50188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Railroad Company v. McClure · Sampson v. Williamson · Hannay v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A forced dispossession [of a homestead] in ejectment is as much within the prohibition [of forced sale of a homestead] as a forced sale under judicial process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.