Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 U.S. 370 - Draper v. Davis

Draper v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

102 U.S. 370 · 1880

Citation profile

119
cited by 119 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

58 federal appellate · 11 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 119 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1999 · most notably Berman v. United States (1937), Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings (1893)

58 federal appellate · 11 district · 13 state decisions

220188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goddard v. Ordway · Jerome v. McCarter · Railroad Company v. Schutte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The power of the justice over the appeal and the security, in the absence of fraud, was exhausted when he took the security and signed the citation. From that time the control of the supersedeas as well as the appeal was transferred to this court; and even here, as we held in Jerome v. McCarter, 21 Wall. 17 , 22 L. Ed. 515 , in the absence of fraud, the action of the justice or judge in accepting the security, within the statute and within our rules adopted for his guidance, was final, so far as it depended on facts existing at the time the security was accepted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.