Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 U.S. 672 - Hartman v. Greenhow

Hartman v. Greenhow’s Empirical Analysis

102 U.S. 672 · 1880

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
26
cited 26 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions (26 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2016 · most notably Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell (1934), Poindexter v. Greenhow (1884)

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 35 state decisions — followed in 16 states

24018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte in the Matter of the Commonwealth of Kentucky v. William Dennison Governor and Executive Authority of the State of Ohio · Murray v. Charleston · Durant v. Essex Co. · Durant v. Essex Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a contract was thus consummated between the State and the holder of the new bonds, and the holders of the coupons....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “be receivable at and af;ter maturity for all taxes, debts, dues and demands due the State,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “An Act to provide for the funding and payment of the public debt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.