State v. Laub’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1977
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Crawford · McIntosh v. State · State v. Crossman · State v. Burch · State v. Aures
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not our province on appeal to judge the credibility of witnesses when their testimony is in direct conflict. We are concerned only with the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the convictions by showing that the jury could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that defendants were guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Romero““The only evidence which points to his guilt is that he made false statements about trading pinenuts for the meat in Nevada and he took part of the meat. This is not sufficient evidence to uphold his conviction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.