102 Wash. 2d 161 - State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably 109 Wash. 2d 222 - State v. Thomas (1987), 105 Wash. 2d 692 - State v. Kwan Fai Mak (1986)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman · 95 Wash. 2d 616 - State v. Jones · 98 Wash. 2d 53 - State v. Sherman · State v. Young · 26 Wash. App. 629 - State v. Dowell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, each of the elements of the lesser offense must be a necessary element of the offense charged. Second, the evidence in the case must support an inference that the lesser crime was committed.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Regardless of the plausibility of this circumstance, the defendant had an absolute right to have the jury consider the lesser included offense on which there is evidence to support an inference it was committed. State v. Jones, 95 Wn.2d 616 , 628 P.2d 472 (1981); State v. Dowell, 26 Wn. App. 629 , 613 P.2d 197 , review denied, 94 Wn.2d 1018 (1980).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The crime of reckless driving... requires the jury to find a defendant conscious and capable of forming a purposeful mental state; he, too, must be found capable of driving with a `wilful [sic] or wanton' disregard for the safety of others.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.