Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Wash. 2d 242 - State v. Richmond

102 Wash. 2d 242 - State v. Richmond’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
5
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 115 Wash. 2d 171 - City of Spokane v. Douglass (1990), 122 Wash. 2d 109 - State v. Halstien (1993)

34 state decisions

1301984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Buckley v. Valeo · Kolender v. Lawson · United States v. Reese · Wainwright v. Stone · 97 Wash. 2d 92 - State v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “statute); Seattle v. Rice, 93 Wn.2d 728 , 612 P.2d 792 (1980) (”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “deficient in terms of providing guidelines to the meaning of lawful excuse. The phrase is nowhere defined and predicting its potential application would be a guess, at best.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[jJudges . . . to decide what constitutes a lawful excuse on a case-by-case basis according to their personal predilections.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.