Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Wash. 2d 689 - State v. Jackson

102 Wash. 2d 689 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

114 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably State v. Pirtle (1995), 115 Wash. 2d 609 - State v. Dennison (1990)

114 state decisions

40019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 96 Wash. 2d 591 - State v. Tharp · 98 Wash. 2d 358 - State v. Saltarelli · 36 Wash. 2d 367 - State v. Goebel · 98 Wash. 2d 30 - State v. Robtoy · 101 Wash. 2d 113 - State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must (1) find by a preponderance of the evidence that the misconduct occurred, (2) identify the purpose for which the evidence is sought to be introduced, (3) determine whether the evidence is relevant to prove an element of the crime charged, and (4) weigh the probative value against the prejudicial effect.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[ejvidentiary errors under ER 404 are not of constitutional magnitude”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.