Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Wash. 2d 777 - State v. LeFever

102 Wash. 2d 777 - State v. LeFever’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably State v. Copeland (1996), 111 Wash. 2d 124 - State v. Brown (1988)

6 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

1501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. DiFrancesco · Bullington v. Missouri · Ryan v. United States · 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · Cabrera-Martinez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[when] [a] defendant elects not to testify following a ruling under ER 609, defendant must ensure that the record includes a declaration of his intention to testify and an adequate offer of proof ... to preserve any error for appellate review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A finding by the court as the trier of fact, without a jury, [1] when read conclusively into the record in such a manner as to indicate that it is neither tentative nor made with reservation or advisement nor subject to further consideration or proceedings in the same case, will support a judgment of acquittal or dismissal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “resultant prejudice... completely overwhelm[ed] any possible relevance or probativeness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.