State v. Julian’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Mabry v. Johnson · 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland · Mabry v. Johnson · 110 Wash. 2d 682 - State v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“THE COURT: All right. Now, your attorney and the prosecuting attorney have discussed this case; and the prosecuting attorney indicated, if you would plead guilty to the crime of Child Molestation in the First Degree, that the State would recommend a [SSOSA] option if you were found amenable to treatment....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Julian“The State initially points out the defense made no objection below that the prosecutor was not honoring the plea agreement. It claims the issue cannot now be raised for the first time on appeal. To be considered for the first time on appeal, an alleged error must be a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Julian“[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: It is, Your Honor. . . . . THE COURT: Do you understand I don't have to follow that agreement? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Julian
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.