Paregol v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2001
6 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dewey v. Clark · American Seating Co. v. Zell · Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp. · Dovel v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. · Shipley v. Major
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * If after suit is brought, a new claim can be added, additional time given to defendant, and counterclaim interposed to the additional claim, the summary nature of the proceeding is lost. * * *” 6”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mahoney v. Campbell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.