¶1In our decision in this case filed February 1, 1968, we made reference to returned checks admitted in the original trial for the purpose of showing a common scheme or 'plan of which the check upon which defendant was being prosecuted was merely a part.
¶2We did not intend by this statement to hold that the checks are admissible without ' establishing their authenticity as instruments uttered by defendant.
¶3Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.