State v. Saiz’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2012 · most notably State v. Hobson (1983), State v. Polsky (1971)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · Royal Netherlands Steamship Co. v. Strachan Shipping Co. · Goss v. Board of Education · Boesche v. Udall · In re Disbarment of Gately
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A criminal defendant may find protection for unreasonable delay in prosecution under the procedural due process provisions of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The defendant must show that the state unreasonably delayed prosecution and that such delay prejudiced his defense." (Emphasis supplied.) State v. Saiz, 103 Ariz. 567, 570, 447 P. 2d 541, 544 (1968).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Marks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.