Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 Ariz. 608 - Huerta v. Flood

Huerta v. Flood’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
March 1996
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 1996 · most notably State v. Church (1973), Commonwealth Ex Rel. Specter v. Moak (1973)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 23 state decisions

2201968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · Thornhill v. Alabama · United States v. Wurzbach · 61 Cal. 2d 331 - Fort v. Civil Service Commission · Ex parte Curtis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"No public officer or public employee of the state, a state agency, or a political subdivision shall directly or indirectly command, ask, coerce, or attempt to coerce any officier or employee of the agency, department, or division, over which he has direct supervision, to pay, lend, or contribute any part of his salary or compensation or anything else of value to any party, committee, organization, agency or person for political purposes."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““B. When a crime or public offense punishable by imprisonment in the state prison is also punishable by fine or imprisonment in a county jail, in the discretion of the court, it shall be deemed a misdemeanor for all purposes after a sentence imposing a punishment other than imprisonment in the state prison.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.