Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 Ark. App. 110 - Kelley v. State

103 Ark. App. 110 - Kelley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 2009 Ark. App. 664 - Price v. State (2009), 2015 Ark. App. 665 - Squyres v. State (2015)

33 state decisions

230200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2256

Relies on Brandenburg v. Ohio · Ashcroft Attorney General v. Free Speech Coalition · Pauley v. Beth-Energy Mines, Inc. · Hess v. Indiana · Bartnicki v. Vopper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person commits the offense of internet stalking of a child if the person being twenty-one (21) years of age or older knowingly uses a computer online service, internet service, or local internet bulletin board service to: .... (2) Seduce, solicit, lure, or entice an individual that the person believes to be fifteen (15) years of age or younger in an effort to arrange a meeting with the individual for the purpose of engaging in: (A) Sexual intercourse; (B) Sexually explicit conduct; or (C) Deviate sexual activity [or] .... (4) Compile, transmit, publish, reproduce, buy, sell, receive, exchange, or disseminate the name, telephone number, electronic mail address, residence address, picture, physical description, characteristics, or any other identifying information on an individual that the person believes to be fifteen (15) years of age or younger in furtherance of an effort to arrange a meeting with the individual for the purpose of engaging in: (A) Sexual intercourse; (B) Sexually explicit conduct; or (C) Deviate sexual activity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “computer online service, internet service, or local internet bulletin board”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.