In Re Spirtos’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2016
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 11 U.S.C. § 509 · 26 U.S.C. § 6323
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Prairie State Nat Bank of Chicago v. United States · 256 Cal. App. 2d 506 - Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co. · New England Fish Company Nefco Rubenstein Nefco v. Ball Bros Inc · Pittsburgh-Westmoreland Coal Co. v. . Kerr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“equitable subrogation is separate and distinct from the subrogation rights afforded by section 509, and that section 509 is an additional, but not exclusive remedy in bankruptcy,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“as between the debtor and such [co-debtor], such [co-debtor] received the consideration for the claim held by such creditor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Feldhahn v. Feldhahn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.