Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

103 Cal. 530

Davis v. Hart

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1894

California Supreme Court · decided 1894-08-13

<p>Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order denying a new trial.</p> <p>The facts are stated in the opinion.</p>

Relies on Richter v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1894-08-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1963

9 state decisions

5018941900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Fitzgerald, J.

¶1There is no brief on file by respondent, nor was the case orally argued in his behalf. ■

¶2As the record shows that the findings are attacked by the specifications on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support them, it follows on the authority of Richter v. Fresno Canal etc. Co., 101 Cal. 582, that the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed.

¶3So ordered.

¶4McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.

/103/cal/530 · .json · Public domain