Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 Colo. 529 - Peterson v. Stitzer

Peterson v. Stitzer’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
5
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2014

4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

60193919401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re the Estate of Zweig · Harding's Admr. v. Harding's Exr. · Johnson v. Samuels · Akin v. . Kellogg · Sheely v. Sheely

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““153-5-4. Surviving spouse may elect. — (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of a testator’s will, his surviving spouse shall have the option to take and receive one-half of the testator’s estate, as provided in section 153-14-10; provided, that such surviving spouse exercises such option by filing in the court in which the testator’s will is admitted to probate, within six months thereafter, his election in writing to take and receive one-half of said estate. The failure to exercise such option within said period of six months shall be conclusive evidence of the consent of the surviving spouse to the provisions of such will. “(2) If the surviving spouse is incompetent, it shall be the duty of his personal representative, or if he has no personal representative or if the personal representative has an adverse interest, a special fiduciary appointed by the court, to ascertain the value of the benefits provided by the will and the value of the rights secured by statute, which findings shall be reported to the court and hearing had thereon. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given to the surviving spouse, to his personal representative or special fiduciary, if any, and to such other persons and in such manner as the court may direct. After the hearing on the report, the court, within six months from the admission of the will to probate, shall make an election for such spouse to take under the will or under the statute, as the court may find to be more advantageou”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is to assure timely notice to the court, to those in charge of the administration of the estate, and to all persons interested therein, that the surviving spouse is dissatisfied with the will and elects to take and receive onehalf of the estate under the statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “legislative acts of this character are simply statutes of limitation fixing a definite time after which an election, if filed, cannot be considered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.