Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 F.1d 269 - In re Feldstein

In re Feldstein’s Empirical Analysis

103 F. 269 · 1900

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
June 1964
most recently cited

7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1964

7 district ·

501900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Counselman v. Hitchcock · Brown v. Walker · People Ex Rel. Taylor v. . Forbes · Dyke v. . Spargur · In re Rosser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Section 7a (9) of tlie present Bankruptcy Act provides as respects the bankrupt bimseif, that ‘no- testimony given by him shall be offered in evidence against him in any criminal proceeding.’ This provision, even if applicable in favor of a witness (which it is not in terms), seems to be no stronger or more effective as a protection that section 860 of the Revised Statutes, which in Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U. S. 547 , 12 Sup. Ct. 195 , 35 L. Ed. 1110 , was on full discussion held insufficient.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.