Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 F.1d 68 - In re Tobias

In re Tobias’s Empirical Analysis

103 F. 68 · 1900

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 1995
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1995

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

201900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Sueh personal estate shall be selected by the householder and set apart in a writing signed by him. He shall, in the writing, designate and describe, with reasonable certainty, the estate so selected and set apart, and ea.ch parcel or article, affixing to each his cash valuation thereof; and the said writing shall be admitted to record to he recorded as deeds are recorded, in tlie county or corporation wherein such householder resides.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.