Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 F.2d 105 - Weicker v. Howbert

Weicker v. Howbert’s Empirical Analysis

103 F.2d 105 · 1939

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
October 1966
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 1966

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

401939194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 112

Relies on Welch v. Helvering · Helvering v. Taylor · The Conqueror · Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co. · Groman v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The term ‘reorganization’ means * -x- -x- (D) a transfer by a corporation of all or a part of its assets to another corporation if immediately after the transfer the transferor or its shareholders or both are in control of the corporation to which the assets are transferred * * * ” [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.