Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 F.2d 378 - Leichsenring v. Freeman

Leichsenring v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

103 F.2d 378 · 1939

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
September 1969
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 1969

2 district ·

1001939194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone Co. · Hildreth v. Mastoras · Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Press Pub. Co. · Preston v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It was clearly demonstrated * * that appellant's device involved the generic principle, and that it worked for a sufficient period of time to show that the application of the principle solved the problem. * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.