Leichsenring v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
103 F.2d 378 · 1939
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 1969
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone Co. · Hildreth v. Mastoras · Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Press Pub. Co. · Preston v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It was clearly demonstrated * * that appellant's device involved the generic principle, and that it worked for a sufficient period of time to show that the application of the principle solved the problem. * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.