Stenger v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis
103 F.2d 410 · 1939
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2000
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 24 App. D.C. 462 - Paul v. Hess · 23 App. D.C. 526 - Hillard v. Brooks · 24 App. D.C. 282 - Lemp v. Mudge · Krueger v. Gautier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * We cannot see why, if they were so satisfied, they laid it aside for more than fourteen months and devoted their activities to a solution of the same problem on a different invention.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kirkham v. Arden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.