Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 F.2d 584 - Devoe v. United States

Devoe v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

103 F.2d 584 · 1939

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
July 1974
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 1974 · most notably The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co. (1957), Williamson v. United States (1962)

27 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

8019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williamson v. United States · Heike v. United States · Thomas Wood Junior v. United States · Clune v. United States · Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is elementary that in the trial of a case, whether civil or criminal, relevant and competent evidence is admissible even though it tends to prove the commission of criminal acts, not in issue, by the party against whom the evidence is offered. Where evidence of transactions between those charged to have been associated in the commission of a criminal act throws light upon the particular transaction for which they were indicted, it is admissible, regardless of the fact that it tends to implicate the defendants in the commission of other offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.