Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 F.2d 77 - Cliffs Corp. v. United States

Cliffs Corp. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

103 F.2d 77 · 1939

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 1979
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1979

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

5019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 902

Relies on Burnet v. Harmel · Weiss v. Wiener · Burk-Waggoner Oil Ass'n v. Hopkins · United States v. Childs · Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unless a particular mode of transfer is prescribed by statute or in the corporate charter or by-laws”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.