Logue v. Dore’s Empirical Analysis
103 F.3d 1040 · 1997
Citation profile
52 federal appellate · 19 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1999), BIW Deceived v. Local S6, Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America (1997)
52 federal appellate · 19 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Whren v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Liteky et al United States · Scott v. United States · Quercia v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the judge's participation must be balanced; he cannot become an advocate or otherwise use his judicial powers to advantage or disadvantage a party unfairly.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An inquiry into the judge's conduct of the trial necessarily turns on the question of whether the complaining party can show serious prejudice.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a judge is not a mere umpire; he is the governor of the trial for the purpose of assuring its proper conduct, and has a perfect right -- albeit a right that should be exercised with care -- to participate actively in the trial proper.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.