Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

103 F.3d 116

Docket No. 95-3186.

Sarah Arenivas v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Sept. 26, 1996. Decided Nov. 26, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-11-26

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Craig v. Chater · Carboni v. J Meldrum Dvm D Dvm Dvm

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-11-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

ARGUED: H. Russell Vick, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. J. Patrick Powers, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Mary Ann Sloan, Acting Chief Counsel, Region IV, Mack A. Davis, Acting Deputy Chief Counsel, Haila Naomi Kleinman, Supervisory Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and MICHAEL, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant Sarah Arenivas appeals from the denial of social security disability benefits by the district court. A careful review of the record, the briefs, and the oral argument before this court compels the conclusion that the Secretary's decision was supported by substantial evidence and that the appropriate law was properly applied, all as set out in the comprehensive opinion of the Magistrate Judge below. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.1996). Accordingly, the district court's decision below is affirmed.

AFFIRMED

/103/f3d/116 · .json · Public domain