Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

103 F.3d 120

Docket No. 96-7100.

Smith v. Johnson-Curl Dds

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 21, 1996. Decided Dec. 4, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Social Consultants International, Incorporated v. Robert Winship Haskell, and First National Bank of Maryland

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Nancy Jane Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Morris Holleran, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Smith v. Johnson-Curl, No. CA-95-968-3 (E.D. Va. June 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (1994)

/103/f3d/120 · .json · Public domain