Hampton v. Page’s Empirical Analysis
103 F.3d 1338 · 1997
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Zant v. Stephens · Soberon v. United States · Yagow v. United States · Clemons v. Mississippi · Kuntz v. City of Dayton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Illinois has a non-weighing statutory scheme to determine if someone is eligible for the death penalty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a label--in bold letters--to its capital sentencing scheme,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.