Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

103 F.3d 135

Docket No. 96-1249.

Gary L. Avery v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 7, 1996. Decided Nov. 27, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-11-27

Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Marriott v. Strong

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-11-27

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Gary L. Avery appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny Avery's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. After carefully reviewing the administrative record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the administrative law judge carefully applied the analysis under Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir.1984), submitted an appropriate hypothetical question to the vocational expert, and properly considered the combined effect of Avery's impairments. We find substantial evidence supports the decision of the Commissioner that Avery is not disabled for social security purposes. We affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

/103/f3d/135 · .json · Public domain