Sandoval v. C Sandoval C’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Zibman v. Tow (2001), in Re: Jereld Joe Michael (1998)
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Stinson v. Williamson · Osborn v. Durant Bank & Trust Co. · Lindberg Armstrong v. A Lindberg · In the Matter of Daniel L Lybrook and Linda Lou Lybrooks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the estate in a converted case consists only of property of the estate as of the date of the original filing that remains in the possession of the debtor on the date of conversion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of Baker · Baker“(a) General Right to Amend. A voluntary petition, list, schedule, or statement may be amended by the debtor as a matter of course at any time before the case is closed. The debtor shall give notice of the amendment to the trustee and to any entity affected thereby. On motion of a party in interest, after notice and a hearing, the court may order any voluntary petition, list, schedule, or statement to be amended and the clerk shall give notice of the amendment to entities designated by the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“allowing an amendment claiming an exemption is different from allowing the exemption itself”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.